Proxmox bare metal vs debian reddit. Members Online • fawazabdullah .

Proxmox bare metal vs debian reddit I decided to bare metal my Debian NAS and Proxmox on NUC. Since I can't I've recently switched from Proxmox OPNsense to hardware Protectli and an Arch box w/ Docker. Up until now I've always just used PCIe passthrough but this is impacted inference speeds which averages at This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. It uses Qemu/KVM, which essentially works like a type 1 hypervisor. I’m looking at installing Proxmox and wondering if it is possible to take an existing bare metal Ubuntu 20. #2 is the reason I Linux containers share the running kernel with the proxmox host, possibly resulting in a security issue. Proxmox(on Debian), can run many Ubuntu (Computers/OS) with many containers (Docker). The gateway proxmox only has one VM : opnsense (with pcie pass through) On all other proxmox nodes have at least one Debian VM for running docker containers (with tango and docker-compose) On some machines, proxmox run another VM for some specific use cases that cannot be run in docker containers. Besides the power of backing up and 180. SMB and NFS server packages are not installed by default Having experimented with k8s for home usage for a long time now my favorite setup is to use proxmox on all hardware. Install Proxmox on the PC and run a virtual Home Assistant Instance on it. I have a bunch of media VMs/services such as Plex and Nextcloud that I would point at the new NAS PC. For example, Titanfall 2 , I get 23ms in the baremetal install, I get around 46 to 50ms in the VM. Single master k3s with many nodes, one vm per physical machine. I, for instance, prefer to run home assistant OS in a VM instead of in docker. I'm debating between a bare metal Linux install of Ubuntu or something, vs proxmox and just firing up a VM in there. use google. It's not really a Linux distribution since your not using the os whatsoever, it's so minimal that it's considered itself a type 1 hypervisor. Whatever might be the "best" option is entirely up to you. The backup functionality is also very easy. there is truenas scale (running debian instead of BSD) if you want a hypervisor then by all means use proxmox but incase you wanted proxmox because you didnt like behyve and but you dont mind I’ve had it in unraid dockers, Debian on a nuc with dockers and docker-compose and bare install; Ive had raspberry pi, proxmox, the lot. If virtualization is important: bhyve and jails aren’t anywhere even remotely close to being as useful and performant as kvm/qemu/proxmox or docker/lxc/kube if containers are your thing. Yeah, +1 for the snapshots. tons of guides on this. Proxmox on the bare metal; VM for Home Assistant (use the proxmox script to set it up - super simple; easy find using google “proxmox home assistant install script”) Separate VM for ZoneMinder Third VM for all my other docker containers. 04 installation and create a virtual machine for use in Proxmox Although I've not done it, I'm guessing you could install Debian on the eMMC and use that as your root disk to get some use out of it. For a while, one of the nodes ran a NAS VM using an HBA and PCI passthrough; however, I recently added another Proxmox node and migrated the NAS to a bare-metal install. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break 12 people said that they run TrueNAS bare metal 5 people said either way is okay, kinda like we use to say in the 60's, "What floats your boat, floats your boat" And 1 person said that they actually run TrueNAS bare metal and virtualized. Running Proxmox and then have TrueNas Scale as a VM. I think it would be the best choice. XCP-ng is kind of middle ground: VMware turnkey-ness (compared to install Debian, then Proxmox and so on), more integrated (less tinkering, everything is going via its API) but also Open Source. I have tested in LXC containers as well but for less headaches I chose VMs. I should add, CORE has official and built your own apps you run in Jails, but overall, Scale makes it way more user friendly and has better compatibility with both hardware and software. This subreddit has gone Restricted With a bare metal installation, this is never a worry has you have all of the components (files, configuration, database) separately and can always integrate those into a future implementation of NextCloud. In some cases it makes sense to install Proxmox VE on top of a running Debian Bullseye 64 First Proxmox is Debian with addons. There is a non-negligible loss of performance when doing this, however the biggest issue for me was the RAM allocation. No, I cannot manage multiple clusters from the proxmox UI at one IP address. Although i wouldn't actually use debian personally, but that point is irrelevant, insert debian for which ever distro you want to use as a vm to host plex. For immediate help and problem solving, please join us at I have a bare metal Rocky Linux server that runs most of my containers and a few bare metal solutions. second on running omv bare metal because it can install proxmox to run alongside so you'll have a This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. I don’t like bringing complexity to the system I do my administration from, because if I fuck Debian vs Slackware? The biggest difference for you may be the user interface and the pre-installed software. The main thing that pulls me toward Proxmox is the ability to do something else without the fear of destroying that what already works. Which technically by definition would make it a Type 2 hypervisor. But i've spent 2 days now finding and following every guide and suggestion I could find. The corosync configuration is somewhat limited when it comes to a larger number of nodes in a Bare metal every time It's only worth doing it in proxmox if you want to try something first and you already have a full proxmox setup up and working. And i was wondering what would be the best option. 2. Why httpd official image runs on ubuntu comments. I run several dozen hosts on my proxmox cluster without issues. As a Proxmox/HA OS sceptic I have been very happy with Debian + Supervised install. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as Given that I’m using the onboard SATA ports for now, and going HBA at a later time (trying to save as much cash right now while still getting the best end-result), should I run TrueNAS inside of Proxmox and then another guest for Plex with the 970 attached, or just run TrueNAS bare metal on the X99 system and then run Plex with the 970 on the I'd use debian over ubuntu, but not for a nas or hypervisor, in your use case i'd use debian as another vm on proxmox to host plex and such. The i7 is one of those micro things about the size of a cable modem. the experience has been overwhelmingly more controlled than having a bare metal windows box attached to the tv hooked up with a controller to play with. I have been running everything bare metal with docker and docker compose for years. Proxmox is the same way. 40 Mbit/s Down and only 10 Mbit/s up on the Proxmox vs 452. proxmox option 2. I often see people in this sub talking about hosting multiple VM's, bare metal, using Proxmox or ESXi. practicalzfs. More an appliance than a "general" distro if you prefer. Dell R710 Proxmox bare-metal VMs or CTs for mainly Plex and Truenas . APC Back-UPS RS 1500 monitored by NAS through USB. 6GHz 4C/8T and 32 GB DDR4, and I cant shake the idea of running proxmox and do pfSense virtualized. Currently that’s Win10 with Win10/Ubuntu/Debian VMs in Proxmox on a different machine. An issue I've come across though, latency for my games is a lot higher in the VM than in the bare metal install. If I could go with Esxi as it used to be, I'd do that. I have a super simple setup: Type 1 meaning it's basically the OS itself (runs on bare metal), and Type 2 meaning it runs on top of an OS. You can get intel-microcode from debian’s nonfree repository. I run a three-node, non-HA Proxmox cluster. reddit aint gonna be able to help you there ;) I got my hands on a lenovo x3250 m6 to replace my much older pfSense/bare metal install. For example ESXi is labeled as a Type 1. OPNSense bare metal or virtualized on Proxmox + Nginx Proxy Manager + PiHole . e. g. She then uses a bluetooth Apple keyboard that is passed through to OSX. Moved to Unriad bare metal and I am enjoying the experience, don't get me wrong spinning up vm's on Proxmox was so much easier and as others have mentioned it's certainly preferred as a dedicated Hypervisor but one thing that Unraid has over Proxmox is the very user friendly app store where you can spin up docker containers and the like with ease, once I got my array I've not worked with proxmox before and it looked a bit tricky. In this case, testing on the Proxmox host system comparing to a Debian VM within (bookwork, 6. Update: fwiw I decided to install a linux distro on bare metal (I like certain things about Rocky/RHEL 9) and will go with openZFS and libvirt to manage storage and virtual machines. Usually you use Proxmox or any Hypervisor to run a pool of resources (multiple servers) and run multiple VMs for various use cases. The "bare Proxmox is Debian under the hood, so the difference isn’t all that big. As unraid I assume if I pass through all of the relevant drives to Unraid on the VM if I find I need to run it bare metal I can just use the same USB Boot drive and re-attach the drives without losing any data. Create a VM with Debian, assign the 6tb drive to it, put samba on it, create a couple of directories and be done with it. ) Debian bare metal, and having Docker/LXCs run on/in that? Just curious - I'm happily set up with Proxmox, I’m planing to do the exact same move from running Unraid on bare metal to running it under Proxmox. Proxmox is that minimal OS that gives you most of the things an OS would give you but without the extra "stuff" a full blown OS brings, which in theory frees up more resources for allocation. I'm wondering if there would be any performance impact when running Docker Containers inside a VM? Nice. While it lacks a web UI for NAS management, it's based on Debian and can be configured for NAS functionalities through the command line. I've had Plex on an SSD, harddrives with ssd cache drive, right now it's on a couple mirrored 10k drives with a small caching ssd that I was thinking of moving metadata over to, but before I work on any more experiments I'd like to solve the stability issues, which probably means also documenting what I have a PC build with older (i7 6700k) but very capable hardware. OMV wouldn’t install in a desktop environment so I installed Debian server. PVE #1 backs up a CT, PVE #2 restores the CT. Works great going on 3 years. The thing is though, I'm not actually sure why I would need multiple VM's or OS's. Nextcloud is an application "suite", you can run it on either of the former, or on bare metal, but it does not compare. It is completely fine. I have some old laptops laying around and I wonder would it be better to use a bare metal hypervisor such as VMware EXSi/vSphere, or install a host OS such as debian to host my stuff? What do yall do with your servers that have 10GB or less memory? Share Proxmox can run both VMs and containers. So I dual booted proxmox with my Win10 before completely getting rid of my Win10 Bare Metal install. It has advantages. x Kernel and also the upgraded 6. I run Debian 12 + Proxmox on my main workstation as I prefer to be in a Linux environment, then have a few different windows VMs running run docker. 6 with minimal variations. I’ve gone for option 2; and it has been serving me well for a couple of years now. Log In / Sign Up; what are the benefits of running a hypervisor, then stacking VMs + Docker or LXCs on that, vs. In a nutshell, Proxmox simply is a suite of utilities and a web UI running on top of minimal Debian 11. This also ensures the storage pools are up before any VM's try to boot. The simple answer: yes, you can install Proxmox on top of Debian. Bare metal Linux with Samba for Windows client access, sshd for remote administration, iptables to firewall access is just fine. . So much more lightweight than VMs. If you need more advanced filesharing, deploy NAS as VM. IMO the potential for customization and automation is the main reason I've been using the Debian + Proxmox route. use the search bar. Then, Proxmox is using a standard ext4 virtio disk on a zfs pool, so it's safe, easy to backup, replicate and snapshot, invisibly to proxmox. Install proxmox on bare server and run HASSOS and pihole container Install Ubuntu + kubernetes and run HASS and pihole containers. Run a kubernetes cluster can be more cost effective on a Hypervisor than on bare metal. on proxmox. If you just want a server to run docker containers then I'd recommend a Debian lite server with Cockpit webUI. Proxmox on bare-metal vs on top of Debian upvotes This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. Had a period of Proxmox in between that and been fiddling with Proxmox on and off for labbing too. We're now read-only indefinitely due to Reddit Incorporated's poor management and decisions related to third party platforms and content management. But not sure if Proxmox will still complain if you try to install it on a pre-existing root disk that resides on eMMC. I have only used windows before. Yes virtualization adds overhead, and I know that. In fact, I ran docker on proxmox Should I deploy TrueNAS as Proxmox VM or Bare metal OS? Solved right. There's a good overview of Debian vs Alpine for containers here: in production, on VMs, bare metal, OpenStack clusters, public clouds and more. Otherwise, when setting up a container from scratch, you're free to use any of the distros Proxmox supports, including Alpine. Here View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. New server is a 1U, 1x E3-1270 v5 3. I have run HAOS in a VM in Proxmox, and I have found HAOS in a VM to be less reliable than bare-metal. First with home assistant in a vm then proxmox in HA vm and then as a Frigate container on proxmox. If you use virtio, At the end of the day it made my life too complicated so I've ran another tests with bare metal OPNsense + unbound + Nginx Reverse Proxy. Proxmox is not a hypervisor. Since I started using Frigate though I noted that the best install method is to use bare-metal where possible, which has set me looking at LXC containers. but other than that. I actually started this journey last year and have attempted to setup Frigate multiple times. My username right now is really just my wife and I, mostly roku and phone. Run docker in Debian which comes with proxmox Run docker in LXC I’ve been a Plex pass user on bare metal for over 10 years. I’ve been a Plex pass user on bare metal for over 10 years. So I have been running Truenas Scale on bare metal but am considering moving it to a Proxmox node to allow for HA and better utilize my hardware. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which I'm wondering about the pros and cons of Proxmox + Ubuntu vs bare metal Ubuntu for my use case. How would such a system look like? First the storage Proxmox machine would have to boot, then the TrueNAS VM, and as final step the VMs on the main Proxmox VM host. Only thing I had that caused a problem was using watchtower to manage other docker containers but that was easily replaced with other options that don’t cause my install to be unsupported. com with the ZFS community as well. Is there a special reason why you want unraid? Is there a special reason why you consider using proxmox? Running one is best for performance, running both at once will give you less performance and open the doors for a lot of potential You run Proxmox/openstack on the hardware (usually several bare metal machines) and it gives you the tools to manage them as a "pool" of resources. Option 2: Run Home Assistant bare-metal on the PC. Proxmox host and Storage are connected on a dedicate network and interface. Currently using a Synology NAS but it’s not a great solution for transcoding video It’s a great solution for audio (plexamp) Convert existing ESXI server to Proxmox. I personally prefer this solution for three reasons. Most modern IT uses containers for applications so the distro doesn't matter that much. I'd then run Arch Linux on bare metal as my main OS, using ZFS as the root filesystem, and passing through the 2080 Ti to Windows for games, and looking glass for the monitor, or using nvidia-xrun when gaming on Linux. just Ubuntu Server bare metal? Read below, but just know that you could run both options for like a week or two and decide what you feel is better for you ;) You can assign all available resources to your single Ubuntu VM. /r/StableDiffusion I'm sorry for asking as there are so many of this same question. Install the bare minimum on Freenas as bare metal or on Proxmox? If this is in a homelab I don’t see the issue, if this is in production id probably run it bare metal. 19, Proxmox VE on 5. Three-node Proxmox VE cluster + bare-metal Proxmox Backup Server + bare-metal Hyper-V server + bare-metal DIY NAS (Debian-based). And the interface is intuitive enough that you can set up vms without even touching commands at all. You can think of it as cutting out the giant OS middleman. Container escape is a thing, let's put the containers in a VM instead of bare metal OS (as root no less!) Some workloads are nice to "de-containerize". you can also just install the linux desktop on proxmox itself as it's just debian linux. Not really. Proxmox excels when you want the containers on a Not exactly the same situation, but I have a media center computer hooked to a TV and I ALSO wanted to use the machine for proxmox. apcupsd service installed on all systems - configured as master on NAS and as network client on other systems. Reply reply When using Proxmox as a layer below a TrueNAS VM i could use these 40Gbps card, instead of the 10Gbps Intel ones in order to connect VM host and storage/Proxmox server. I highly doubt you need ubiquiti dream machine. Or check it out in the app stores Home OpnSense on Proxmox vs bare metal install? Discussion I'm going to set out on installing OpnSense for the first time. Newly installed Proxmox installation. 1 kernel). One good option (for me) is keeping NVMe drives under Proxmox and pass through the SATA controller to the NAS OS. You can run Plex or whatever alongside these on the same bare metal machine and let the scheduler handle the resources, unless it needs dedicated resources for performance reasons, in which case a Linux VM is probably best. 4. Honestly ProxMox on bare metal is better than TrueNAS especially if you're running VMs and Containers. For immediate help and problem solving, please join us at https://discourse. Hey, I've a Ryzen 7 5700x PC Build + two old i5-5200U laptops that I'd like to use as a homelab Kubernetes Cluster. Turnkey File Server LXC vs Manually setup Debian LXC File Server, what's the community preference? I currently have a bare metal machine (on its last breath) that runs Ubuntu Server 20. Ok load Proxmox onto bare metal. docker VM with nvidia p400 and HBA passthrough with ZFS on same VM bare metal option. Much happier. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Why this vs. I prefer bare metal because I don’t tinker with it in the same way that I do with my Proxmox server. Besides, proxmox is just debian under the hood. See, when you run the storage pools on bare metal Proxmox you have all the RAM available for the ZFS cache. Hi all, having some problems which I hope I can resolve because I REALLY want to run Proxmox on this machine and not be stuck with just OPNsense running on bare metal as it's infinitely less useful like this. Dell R710 Proxmox bare-metal VMs or CTs for mainly Plex and Truenas HomeServer OS - Debian vs Truenas Core vs Scale vs Proxmox Proxmox is easy enough to understand if you have even the slightest knowledge of basic debian based command line. So you could run docker directly on the proxmox host, just the same as on bare metal debian/ubuntu server. You’ll just install Debian and then Proxmox on top of that. Yet it's a software stack that runs on Linux. So, I decided to run TrueNAS as bare metal. My choices are: Proxmox and then Debian VM to run snapRaid+mergerFS+Plex, or Debian or Ubuntu, and then install proxmox as level 2 hypervisor, on which I will spin up a Debian VM to run snapRaid+mergerFS+Plex. The (bare metal) drives could be managed and RAID array created by Proxxmox itself, and as a logical unit attached to a VM or container to be used by? That's interesting. Esxi was nice, Proxmox is a PITA, and Docker is easier since I don't have to worry about a bare metal hypervisor for OPNsense. I really enjoy Proxmox and it served me really well in the past 3 years. Currently using a Synology NAS but it’s not a great solution for transcoding video It’s a great solution for audio (plexamp) I have some old laptops laying around and I wonder would it be better to use a bare metal hypervisor such as VMware EXSi/vSphere, or install a host OS such as debian to host my stuff? What do yall do with your servers that have 10GB or less memory? Proxmox can run both VMs and containers. its easy. Proxmox VE (Debian 10 Buster) - Host operating system comes for the Odyssey Blue SBC. I give 1 nic for truenas file shares and 1 nic for proxmox access. Regardless, you still need real storage for the VMs/Containers. Before I used proxmox i had a Debian kvm /libvirt hypervisor, this was also fine but not as comfortable as proxmox from an hypervisor view. I have done a similar thing moving from Proxmox to OVM in the past without issue. Bare metal (WIN10) or Proxmox? 12 SAS bay,128GB machine running BI on KVM to bare metal i7 w/32GB. ) on bare-metal. more "bare metal", less system overhead. Super easy migration. The Proxmox ISO makes a number of assumptions about partition layouts, network configuration, and user accounts that differ from the way I set my cluster up. What I did was install debian as the OS on the HOST machine, I then installed plasma desktop on top of that, this gave me something similar to kubuntu which is what I normally use, but because I used debian as the I'd say install Proxmox, then Ubuntu Server as a VM. What Proxmox gives is real easy flexibility to spin up a VM or a LXC with little effort. I am wondering if there is any big performance difference between running multiple websites with docker and npm comparing to running docker and npm in bare metal. It’s still running on “bare metal” and ends up being effectively the One issue I am currently struggling with is whether I should remove Proxmox and install Linux directly rather than as a VM. Proxmox is built on Debian. just the same as on bare metal debian/ubuntu server. Proxmox is a great solution if you want to quickly spin up discreet VMs. Proxmox on bare-metal vs on top of Debian I was going to just build a regular bare metal windows PC but, since I've been spending a lot of time over the last month getting familiar with proxmox, I've seen a few videos recently on passing through the gpu to a windows VM and treating it as though it's a bare metal install while still getting all of the benefits of a proxmox host. Because i do not like to add another layer between computer and OS/software. So why do you think that Debian kernels are newer? However, what other pros/cons are there of either approach? If you prefer If I understand you correctly, the HA OS image directly on NUC and the HA OS in a VM using Proxmox, is exactly the same instance of Home Assistant (performance, looks, I can't directly answer your questions or concerns, but AFAIK in principle Proxmox uses a sort of "hybrid" approach, where the OS/packages are Debian & the Kernel is Ubuntu. Unless you need to run multiple operating systems, I recommend sticking with docker on plain debian. Get app Get the Reddit app Log In Log in to Reddit. For me it crashes once every month or two and the vm has to be rebooted. Of course it shoots up around 20% when browsing clips. this way - you really should start over and install a Linux dist (debian/ubuntu/etc. 04 with Webmin. Pass through the HD’s you want to use for Truenas + Apps (like Plex and all of the Arr’s) create zfs pools on pass through drives use 3 drives for each pool. Working flawlessly, soaking my 100/100 Mbit line. Members Online • fawazabdullah . In future if required I can add one more Proxmox Host without worrying for its storage. For immediate help and problem solving, please join us at https://discourse She uses Proxmox as bare metal OS and does a GPU passthrough to VM running OSX. truecharts are built on scale's debian linux. I've been hosting my own Ubuntu server for a while now, but I would like to try something new. I got these mysterious grey question marks on Proxmox that I could not figure out what causes it. So 3 12TB drives will give you 24 TB of usable storage. I actually tested this with the same pool, in Proxmox bare metal and TrueNAS VM with the controller passed through. At the bare metal level, you are usually using RHEL or Ubuntu, in which the kernel gets passed into the container. 1. If you choose to stay on proxmox, you can create a LXC and run docker I want to use Proxmox as a virtualization level but I'm not sure if I should go bare metal or not. VM CPU performance is usually only a few percent less than running on bare metal I run proxmox as my main gaming pc in the lounge. I am not opposed to learning something new as long as the learning proxmox can do disk pooling, ZFS and filesharing natively. The amazing UIs of Proxmox and TrueNAS are appreciated, but in the long run, get in my way. These are used for managing native Linux capabilities like virtual networking and Kernel-based Virtual Machines (KVMs). Advangates : I find this arrangement cool, uses very little resources and plenty of room for Proxmox host as read/write IO's is a responsibility of storage host. In my use case I prefer to keep my virtual machines as far apart from the bare metal boat as possible. I'd say that Ubuntu LTS is probably the closest for the bare metal. I wanted to test things out first. Members Online. I've been running TrueNAS Core (well, FreeNAS) for a couple of years, before that I ran CentOS with a mix of bare metal installs and VMs. Or you could run that in a vm for easy backups, since proxmox wants you to treat the host as cattle and not a pet This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. There are features I wish proxmox had. Like i have today or Running TrueNas Scale as bare-metal host. 1) home assistant core 2) debian with docker for some containers i want to have separated from my main Rocky Linux server. Running hassos in a vm on unraid has been an absolute dream. Having TrueNas as bare-metal will allow me to setup VM’s and Docker containers from the system itself and allocate all resources where i want them. It's Debian but that matters not for virtualization. It's more comparable to VMWare's vsphere than docker, i. Doing a bit of benchmarking vs bare metal. Welcome to the IPv6 community on Reddit. Tried Proxmox with both the stock 5. Especially when you start using HA and clustering a Hypervisor may be more suitable. The cpu overhead is <3% with kvm (assuming you didn’t get your cpu from an antique shop). ”Proxmox firewall” is debian firewall which is the same iptables found in millions of linux machines across multiple other distributions besides debian. Running VMs and Dockers on Unraid, running under proxmox is just adding layers and layers of unnecessary complexity to the situation. So if you want to install samba, or nfs, or whatever, go for it. Seeking Advice: Best Setup for Nextcloud Instance on Proxmox (VM vs LXC, Debian vs Ubuntu, Docker vs No Docker) Bare metal, no containers. You can achieve the same installation by installing Debian and then installing proxmox VE (whichever version is intended for your Debian version). Running TrueNas through Proxmox will limit my machine resources. I run Docker for my Our documentation makes this quite clear: "Using the provided ISO will get you started in just a few minutes, that’s why we recommend this method for new and existing Debian Buster is on 4. It just streamlines so much and avoids the layer of abstraction you will The difference in performance in bare metal vs virtualization on any moderately modern cpu will be negligible comparing to a fluctuation in your ISP network. I would like to know the advantages and disadvantages of all the following methods of running docker containers in Proxmox. There will be a little added complexity in setting it up because you will need to pass through the drives that you will use to the VM. docker VM with nvidia p400 passthrough and ZFS on TrueNAS VM (allows CIFS mounts to work) proxmox option 3. As others have said, do both: Install docker in a VM on Proxmox. It's been running great on debian and I can manage it all through portainer / cockpit. And since 24h it runs rock solid Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Hypervisor (Proxmox and TrueNAS Scale, 2 bare metal machines) HostVM (NixOS and Fedora Server) Containers container data on SMB-storage (On TrueNAS) Proxmox is based on Debian, so it can do everything Debian can do (including running docker). I have seen people talk about proxmox and other virtual machines, how complicated is it to get that running? If you are not 100% sure about what your final configuration will be, Proxmox allows for the flexibility of trying different NAS management OS without having to go through a bare metal reinstallation every time. Preferences are fine, but the reality is that Proxmox offers ZFS support and is based on Debian, and also supports NFS/SAMBA shares. I’ll occasionally go to a docker or even truenas for secondary Plex servers (guest access, testing, etc) but my primary has typically been bare metal. It's true that proxmox downtime means network downtime, but my wife owns a kindle and can deal with the 10 minute interruption. This was a tough call between proxmox and a full os, but I'm more comfortable going this route I think. com with It's fine to use, most homelabs use only one machine and ZFS is built-in to proxmox. On the proxmox, I only have 2 running vm's. 52 Mbit/s Down and 395 Mbit/s up on the baremetal And that Debian VM running among others NZBGet has 1 proc at 2,4, 2 threads and 8 GB of RAM. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest Bare metal Truenas with 1 vm running proxmox is "the way". I am not saying HyperV is better than proxmox, but what I will say is, proxmox is definitely awesome for a free product and if cost is a problem, stay with proxmox. You can also do the other way around with TrueNAS bare metal and VMs for the rest since TrueNAS supports VMs. It will net the sum of 2 drive with the 3rd used as parity. I run OMV on Proxmox with physical disks mapped to the omv vm, i can not notice any performance difference to a bare metal installation if this is what you mean with experience. Proxmox is fine if you have 2-5 hosts. Software that runs on top of Debian. Edit: typos To be fair proxmox is basically just debian + kvm + lxc + a web gui. A virtual machine completely isolates the machine from the proxmox kernel. If you ensure direct disk access, your VM will deliver pretty much the same performance as bare-metal installation. Now that I've sought, again, a simpler pre-packaged solution, I wonder if I should be worried about future development of AIO. A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. Which of these would be eaiser and more reliable. Looking for feedback from the community on whether this is advisable and what advantages or disadvantages there might be to doing this. Had a full proxmox cluster at home and went with HyperV recently. just running (e. Load Truenas Scale as a VM in Proxmox. I have been running Homeassistant on Proxmox for the past year or so without issue. I was wondering If I should go bare-metal or make some VMs using Proxmox or any other virtualization tool and install my cluster on top of these VMs. I see some people put OpnSense on Proxmox and pass through a pcie network card. Proxmox is a Linux distribution. Is anyone here running Windows 11 as a Proxmox VM that has run benchmarks on how much performance loss is to be expected VS running it in bare metal? I'd like to have my new 4U server build be my main gaming machine but I'm also getting rid of my ancient 1U QNAP NAS and will go for a TrueNas setup running in a Proxmox VM. r Windows vs Proxmox Since you are building a new box, I highly recommend trying Proxmox. Proxmox was fine, but it felt like I needed to tinker more with settings in order to make it work how I want it. 2. Hello everyone, I have an old dell server R710 that I have installed The other option is to wipe Proxmox, install TrueNAS bare metal and setup all my VMs inside TrueNAS, but I'm not entirely sold on that since some have mentioned inconsistencies with TrueNAS's VM system (might be outdated info), and I like the idea of having my VM host independent of my file server OS (might also be based on outdated info). I've done it for nothing more than wanting to be able to encrypt the entire installation (which the Proxmox ISO does not give you the option for, but Debian does). if you have proxmox 7 you gotta change some of the settings to include a 2. > The installation of a supported Proxmox VE server should be done via bare-metal ISO installer. are you a crazy corp with restrictions? research all three and make an informed decision. Not ideal for 30, 50, 100 hosts. Similarly, restoring those backups onto other Proxmox hosts is super easy if all hosts mount the same NFS storage. Expand user menu Open settings menu. It's a lot more work to do it I run OMV on Proxmox with physical disks mapped to the omv vm, i can not notice any performance difference to a bare metal installation if this is what you mean with I switched from proxmox to plain debian with HA and a bunch of other services as docker containers, including mqtt and frigate. in lxc. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. I also have proxmox installed on a different server. After hours of search over the internet and reading a lot of documentation, I'm more confused than at the beginning. For sure with a TrueNAS bare metal I'll use this the most ! Personally I think Proxmox is the most intuitive for spinning up and taking down VMs and containers, so you'll be spending the most time in that particular GUI, as opposed to your filesystem setup, which could be the NAS OS or OS of your choice initially setup and then mostly left alone. I would love to have a full Linux machine on bare metal which I have never had before. Basically I’ll combine 2 small servers into currently have (one runs Proxmox the other Unraid) into a single more capable / modern one. ubuntu server with docker and ZFS bare metal + KVM I'm currently leaning towards the bare metal option since I have minimal need for VMs. 8x5M pixel, and 2x12M pixel cams, 10 total, and sits around 5% CPU. Any time you have to shutdown/reboot your VM host it means OMV is down too, and that storage is unavailable. kzq kpli fvh dlraf irxwi jeo qvwxlnm eprxnixd fvwafhj okbi